Hi - just trying to get a feel for if hot shot packs are considered wargear? (Is anything other than a weapon wargear?)......if they are then van Saar sub teks are eligible for a very handy upgrade as they can take wargear from the TP......
Plasma is the most efficient option, so what? That doesn't mean you can't get a viable build without it or lascannons. I threw this together in 5 minutes and I'd be plenty happy with this as my starting gang.Going no plasma at all is going to give you a pretty weak gang. Unless you go for double lascannons, but that is a really fringe build.
Even if you face only toughness 3, fighters with plasma guns are going to do a lot more damage than the same credits worth of fighters with hotshot lasguns.
What is viable is going to depend on the meta where you play. So it's going to vary greatly.Plasma is the most efficient option, so what? That doesn't mean you can't get a viable build without it or lascannons. I threw this together in 5 minutes and I'd be plenty happy with this as my starting gang.
![]()
That list looks solid. Its not optimised, but Id honestly prefer using that than a traditional plasma spam van saar list if I was only playing 2d games (or heavily playing them). the Str 4 across all the gangers and the meltagun gives you the umph.Plasma is the most efficient option, so what? That doesn't mean you can't get a viable build without it or lascannons. I threw this together in 5 minutes and I'd be plenty happy with this as my starting gang.
![]()
No offence, but the more I read of your advice and meta, the more I think you play a game that is massively more cut throat than pretty much anyone else I have spoken to, on here on in real world (and I've run several tournaments for necromunda over the years). Bringing a meltagun and a load of str 4 shots is not a weak gang. Its not optimised, sure but its not weak.The list you have there is what I would consider really really bad. But hey, maybe you play in a super soft meta, I don't know.
It's a far from optimised build but if you would consider this 'really really bad' I'm wondering if your group would be better suited to something like 40k where competitive tournaments and meta chasing are the norm (and if not the norm, not surprising) rather than a casual narrative game.What is viable is going to depend on the meta where you play. So it's going to vary greatly.
The list you have there is what I would consider really really bad. But hey, maybe you play in a super soft meta, I don't know.
Non taken.No offence, but the more I read of your advice and meta, the more I think you play a game that is massively more cut throat than pretty much anyone else I have spoken to, on here on in real world (and I've run several tournaments for necromunda over the years). Bringing a meltagun and a load of str 4 shots is not a weak gang. Its not optimised, sure but its not weak.
To be honest, I do agree with you on the leader and specialist (I had assumed both were given cheap starters as they would uprate to better weapons later on, but if that is meant as a base loadout, you are right, they are bad.But regardless of meta, that melee archeotek is just a complete waste of 220 credits. And when you throw more than a fifth of your list down the drain, I can't force myself to give it any other evaluation than "really really bad". Add to that that there is a 165 credit leader who puts out nothing else than strength 3, D1 hits with no AP and that the specialist is armed with a laspistol only. I'm sorry, but it's just not good.