My space wolves are not the ones I’m considering. I love those guys.There's almost certainly a market for them. How big and how much people are willing to spend is another matter.
I would consider buying Space Wolves from that era, preferably unpainted with unassembled being optimal.
People have put stickers over the signs saying “don’t stick stuff up here”.Notice anything?

eBay sellers have been targeted to.What is going on with GW at the moment? I’ve heard about a bunch of C&D requests being sent out and some legal threats but I’m not entirely sure why GW is doing it now, as opposed to any of the previous years they could have.
I can understand on clamping down on scams and deliberate fakery - I’m surprised eBay hasn’t been given a harsh speaking to to by GW’s lawyers - given how anything even vaguely connected to wargaming gets given a Warhammer tag to get views.
Are they really that bothered by 3rd parties making resin bases just because they “Warhammer compatible”?
Will foam carrying case companies now have to use weird euphemisms because they can’t use GW product names to let their customers know which cases are suitable for which model lines??
But GW will GW. Wonder if they’re going to stop using any of the extensive amounts of other people’s IP they’ve… err… paid homage to… ?
Nah, didn’t think so.
In some ways, about time. I’m fed up with a lot of the misleading items on there.eBay sellers have been targeted to.
According to someone on the Reddit thread, Games Workshop sued No Guts No Galaxy with a copyright claim over 'Warhammer' fridge magnet, a Florida based firm is doing the suing on behalf of GW, is to do with optics and you can get away with this in certain US States.What is going on with GW at the moment? I’ve heard about a bunch of C&D requests being sent out and some legal threats but I’m not entirely sure why GW is doing it now, as opposed to any of the previous years they could have.
The reason GW is hiring another company to do that is because the last time they tried something like this it got a rather big backlash from the community. So they learned from their mistakes and now people rather defend GW and point their finger to the "clown lawyers" instead of going after them.
And as this is not the first time they are doing it, it is always the same reasoning behind, the know pretty well that those are generic terms used by others and that the terms are older in the gaming context than their own version.
But their hope is that not enough recognize it, the lawsuit goes proceeds and from that point on they have a stronger standpoint on enforcing it
They once even tried to claim that it is Games Workshop who owns the copyright of pictures of painted models because they made the original model
They tried to lay a copyright claim (not just a trademark) on Space Marines or Roman Numerals and threatened to sued online forums for copyright infringement if they allowed people to discuss rules or point cost for their models on those platforms
Always in little steps in hope that not too many people are going to recognize and there won't be any backlash that interrupt sales while trying to tighten up their grip on the hobby.
In addition, they only do this if they expect their "opponent" being the smaller one (those who don't have enough money to hire lawyers or just enough to cover their own case and not go to court over that, not like a small company tried and went bankrupt because of that despite GW losing the majority of claims), like they themselves removed "Malekith" so that anything like that won't bring them up against Disney.
I think the biggest problem is that original 80s Goblin Green was produced in big vats and had no Quality Control! So there was a lot of variation as they put the paint in the little pots.although I would say the colour is further away from the original versions I used to use.
I was in Oxford this week...
spire?